<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Health and dis-ease</title>
	<link>http://healthanddisease.today.com</link>
	<description>Keeping the former prevents the latter</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Poor Parenting: Time to Require a License to be a Parent by marenemorgan</title>
		<link>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2009/01/04/poor-parenting-time-to-require-a-license-to-be-a-parent/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>marenemorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2009/01/04/poor-parenting-time-to-require-a-license-to-be-a-parent/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hi DNCResearch,
Thanks for your comment.  I am responding from true ignorance - not inviting you to enter into a spitting contest.  What provision(s) of the US Constitution do you think prohibits this sort of testing?  Also, since this is a health and safety matter, it is more properly within the realm of states' governance.  However, the feds take over anything they'd like by invoking the Commerce Clause.  
I am thinking that the most viable way to accomplish the pre-parenting training and license goal is to tie it to an economic benefit.  For example, many federal grants and loans for college are pre-conditioned on males proving they have registered with Selective Service.  Supposedly in China, one's health benefits are tied to limiting the family to one child.  I wonder if that would be the way to accomplish the goal of a little training and a little prevention of child abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi DNCResearch,<br />
Thanks for your comment.  I am responding from true ignorance - not inviting you to enter into a spitting contest.  What provision(s) of the US Constitution do you think prohibits this sort of testing?  Also, since this is a health and safety matter, it is more properly within the realm of states&#8217; governance.  However, the feds take over anything they&#8217;d like by invoking the Commerce Clause.<br />
I am thinking that the most viable way to accomplish the pre-parenting training and license goal is to tie it to an economic benefit.  For example, many federal grants and loans for college are pre-conditioned on males proving they have registered with Selective Service.  Supposedly in China, one&#8217;s health benefits are tied to limiting the family to one child.  I wonder if that would be the way to accomplish the goal of a little training and a little prevention of child abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poor Parenting: Time to Require a License to be a Parent by dncresearch</title>
		<link>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2009/01/04/poor-parenting-time-to-require-a-license-to-be-a-parent/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>dncresearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2009/01/04/poor-parenting-time-to-require-a-license-to-be-a-parent/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>It is absolutely horrific that children die, no matter how or why. But, the mandation of preparental training and testing is unconstitutional (not to mention virtually unenforceable), nor will those solve the problem. People are going to do stupid, hurtful things that are just plain wrong, but legislation won't stop those things from being done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is absolutely horrific that children die, no matter how or why. But, the mandation of preparental training and testing is unconstitutional (not to mention virtually unenforceable), nor will those solve the problem. People are going to do stupid, hurtful things that are just plain wrong, but legislation won&#8217;t stop those things from being done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLL: A Caregiver&#8217;s Introduction by marenemorgan</title>
		<link>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2008/11/06/cll-a-caregivers-introduction/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>marenemorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2008/11/06/cll-a-caregivers-introduction/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I'll take all the help I can read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I&#8217;ll take all the help I can read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CLL: A Caregiver&#8217;s Introduction by Lis Sowerbutts</title>
		<link>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2008/11/06/cll-a-caregivers-introduction/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Lis Sowerbutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://healthanddisease.today.com/2008/11/06/cll-a-caregivers-introduction/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi lissie here from HubPages. I did promise that harassment service for free - but you are well ahead of most of my referrers of actually writing something LOL. I'll do a hub in the next day or so of how to make your blog prettier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi lissie here from HubPages. I did promise that harassment service for free - but you are well ahead of most of my referrers of actually writing something LOL. I&#8217;ll do a hub in the next day or so of how to make your blog prettier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


